Furina Changes How You BUILD Your Characters! | Genshin Impact



►Check me out on Twitch 🙂 Streaming Genshin & more all the time! ► http://twitch.tv/eakestv

► Support us making content directly 🙂 http://patreon.com/eakestv

Follow me or join the communities here!
http://twitch.tv/eakestv
https://twitter.com/EakesTV
https://discordapp.com/invite/Tt4pPCX
https://tiktok.com/@eakestv

► Songs used! I do not own any of this music.

#GenshinImpact #Genshin #Furina

source

35 thoughts on “Furina Changes How You BUILD Your Characters! | Genshin Impact”

  1. furina doesn't make base stat goblet better than dmg bonus goblet, she just increase the value of it. she is just closing the differences between no elemental goblet and with elemental goblet. elemental goblet is still better, somehow, and yes i do the math so you dont have to.

    Reply
  2. Actually, with Furina and the hunter set, we even can use attack goblet and circlet. Also, a lot of character prefer the hunter set this way. Like Yoimia and Noelle

    Reply
  3. Unless you have good atk or hp goblets lying around no one is going to go back and rebuild the characters that they spent their blood sweat and tears on
    This is mainly for if you dont have a character built yet that you want to use with furina this is an option
    But even then, having an elemental goblet is just overall easier if youre not necessarily always going to be using your characters with furina

    Reply
  4. I mean you are correct but the tricky part is getting those max fanfare stacks, because you will need either a character that can sacrifice their hp or a burst healer for the whole team. As Furina's court only takes your hp to 50% and the burst doesn't last that long.

    So Furina's ult is never gonna be at max Dmg% all the time so dmg% is still overall better unless you are in a Dendro team then you can make an argument for EM or if you have Furina's C1, then attack% is fine.

    But there is so many sources of attack% in the game anyway that dmg% is still a better choice because its in the multiplicative part of the damage formula.

    Reply

Leave a Comment