BAD NEWS! POTENTIAL FURINA AND KOKOMI RERUNS IN VERSION 5.4 | No Madame Ping – Genshin Impact

by



🎯 GET 13% OFF On Genesis Crystals! Spend US$80 to Get a Free Welkin Moon!
👉Register for LDShop using my link to claim a 5% off coupon: https://chain.ldshop.gg/T4n3pKUzZ
🔒Safe & Convenient, all you need is UID! Enjoy your initial Top-Up Double Bonus at a big deal here!

Join LDShop.gg Discord to participate in more events: https://discord.gg/WdhgDsvhrS

Let’s first see what we know about this new character, Kimitsuki ayano. According to A reliable leaker, Full Stop Chan, has revealed a new character named Kimitsuki Ayano coming in Version 5.4. This character is from Inazuma, but sadly, we don’t know their rarity or element yet. Full Stop Chan mentioned that ‘Kimitsuki Ayano’ is a translated name from Chinese, which means the official English version might change once the character is announced. This isn’t uncommon, as we have seen it happen multiple times before.

If Kimitsuki Ayano turns out to be a 5-star character, she’s likely taking the spotlight in version 5.4, which leaves us with three more character slots to consider. Now, let’s address a question that’s been circulating—Is Madame Ping finally coming in 5.4? Honestly, it doesn’t seem likely. Here’s why: a lot of leakers have speculated that Madame Ping’s playable name will be Lanya. But something strange happened in version 5.3—Hoyoverse revealed a new character named Lan Yan, a 4-star character from Liyue. Notice anything? The names Lanya and Lan Yan are surprisingly similar. It’s almost too close to be a coincidence. Lan Yan has been confirmed as a completely separate character with no connection to Madame Ping, but this could explain some of the confusion. It’s possible that data miners initially mistook Lan Yan for Madame Ping, given that both characters are from Liyue.

As of now, we have no credible leaks suggesting Madame Ping will be playable in version 5.4. Even Hxg, a well-known insider, mentioned her name only once—and that was to say “No Madame Ping in version 5.3.” While it’s still possible we’ll see her down the line, there’s nothing concrete to suggest she’s joining the roster just yet.

Alright, with three spots left to fill and plenty of characters still waiting for their reruns, let’s jump into the speculation. First up: the Archons. By the time version 5.4 rolls around, almost all the Archons will have had their banners, except for two—Furina and Venti. Many rumors suggest that Venti’s rerun will likely be in version 5.5. If that’s accurate, then the Archon with the highest chance of rerunning in 5.4 is Furina. And honestly, this lines up perfectly. Think about it: Furina’s rerun could follow a pattern we’ve seen before. Back in Fontaine’s earlier versions, Arlecchino got her banner in version 4.6, and in the very next patch, Furina followed with hers. Now look at what’s happening again. Arlecchino is confirmed to have her banner in version 5.3, and if history repeats itself, Furina being in the 5.4 lineup feels likely. Plus, let’s not forget—there’s usually an Archon banner in every patch. So, Furina’s return makes a lot of sense. All the archons who received a rerun were featured in the second phase banners. So it’s most likely that Furina will be in the second phase too.

Now, with only two spots left, it’s easier to narrow things down. The characters most likely to return in this version are Kokomi and Cloud Retainer.

Let’s start with Kokomi. Her last banner was back in the Sumeru patches, and since then, she hasn’t had a single rerun. It’s been almost two years, which is a long time. If you remember when Furina first had her banner, there was another Hydro character in the same patch. When Furina returned for a second banner, guess what? Another Hydro character was featured. This pattern makes Kokomi’s return in version 5.4 much more likely.

As for Cloud Retainer, well, she’s not a Cryo character, which is actually a good thing. Mihoyo tends to be more hesitant with Cryo characters, but Cloud Retainer has a solid chance of coming back in this patch. So, if she’s a character you’re interested in, it’s a good time to start saving up.

source

46 thoughts on “BAD NEWS! POTENTIAL FURINA AND KOKOMI RERUNS IN VERSION 5.4 | No Madame Ping – Genshin Impact”

  3. Furina would be crazy.
    They basically released Neuvillettes best team since 5.0

    Kazuha in 5.0
    Xilonen in 5.1
    Neuvi in 5.2
    And potential Furina rerun in 5.4
    I really hope this is true 😭😭

    Reply

  9. This is going to be SO hard because I want arlechino, furina, and Kokomi. And my account is f2p so I have to choose lol. I might have to go for Kokomi because she is not a very popular character and won't have a lot of reruns so this is my chance!

    Reply

  12. I don't think that Kokomi will be on another limited banner. She'll end up in an Inazuma chronicled wish banner during version 5, I guess. But Shenhe needs to appear on another limited banner…

    Reply

  15. Don’t trust these ai leaks channel too much. They’re mostly not to be trusted with these leaks, especially since reruns are only finalised and even decided when the beta of that version starts. 5.4 characters will be known when 5.3 launches

    Reply

  37. plz help i am confused who should i pull for

    5.2 : Neuvillette ( he's strong and i like his personality)

    5.3 , phase 2 : Arlechino ( must pull )

    5.4 : Furina ( i have crush on her )

    the problen is if i pulled for neuvillette so i might go low on resources for furina or i can also loose 50/50 on Arlechino……. I'm confused what should i do ?

    Reply

  43. I do believe Furina has a huge chance of rerunning in 5.4. More of a chance than Venti. I think Venti will rerun either in 5.5 or in a possible Mondestat expansion in 5.6 (unless 5.5 surprises everyone with a Windblume event). This is going off of us getting no map expansion in 5.3 meaning we’ll likely get an expansion in 5.4. I’m assuming no map expansion in 5.5 so we’ll get one in 5.6.

    Note: These aren’t leaks (minus the no map in 5.3). I’m just making educated guesses.

    Reply

Leave a Comment