Kazuha vs Sucrose Damage Buff Comparison (Elemental Mastery Build) | Genshin Impact



Just a quick comparison of who can boost your damage more 🙂

Thanks for watching!

Music:
ZINNIE – MØON

#GenshinImpact #Kazuha #Sucrose

source

49 thoughts on “Kazuha vs Sucrose Damage Buff Comparison (Elemental Mastery Build) | Genshin Impact”

  1. So basically Kazuha is gated by his weapons. At C2 I would say he's stronger than sucrose at buffing in general, it's just that sucrose has access to a three-star weapon that's more broken than some 4-5 stars in supporting. I love sucrose and was one of the few people who played her a ton back when many just though she was budget venti but I love my Kazuha more as he just fits my style so well.

    Reply
  2. So the only thing that wants one to pull for him are
    1.you like his personality / his playstyle lmao

    till now I thought Sucrose can keep up to Kazuha but nmm if you invest in building Sucrose,
    1. she is a better support
    2. her damage scaling can be on the same level as of decent Kazuhas (still her being an alot better damage amplifier outdoes Kazuhas bit more damage)

    Conclusion: Kazuha is just a moneymagnet to benifit mihoyo cause of his "coolness" and his "fun playstyle" and we already have a better Kazuha which is even 4* …damn Mihoyo do be wanting our money

    Reply
  3. I pulled for kazuha but i hoped for kazuha to be a bit better and perform way better than sucrose at c0. also hoped the em bonus wouldn't be tied to his constellation

    Reply
  4. One thing I find about kazuha is that the element he swirls is the one he is in contact with while others like sucrose and venti prefers swirling element the enemy is in contact with. Which makes it easier for him to shred shields in the abyss imo but I think both sucrose and kazuha does quite the same thing when it comes to support roles

    Reply
  5. You need to show Diluc's elemental mastery. EM has diminishing returns so if Diluc has low EM, Sacarosa would be Much better on him. Its relevant to show all stats to understand who could be better in a specific scenario.

    Reply
  6. They’re both good, I have sucrose before but now I am using kazuha too along side my sucrose cus I love them both. Also it’s amazing sucrose (4 star) can keep up with a 5 star. But overall kazuha is my fave character to play and he’s sooo fun. I love sucrose’s gameplay too but it requires a lot of stamina

    Reply
  7. kazu can boost everyone elemental dmg if more than one element is swirled, so in the end for example lets say you have diluc and fischl, and kazu achieve to swirl both elements, then diluc and fischl will have a massive boost on their pyro and electro dmg output.

    This video comparison is more like reaction dmg boost, since we are comparing one big melt hit, but if we take into consideration overall dmg amplification im sure kazuha wins if we put my example as a proof.

    Reply
  8. kazuha lets us have a new way to min max (giving elem dmg boost). so we can try putting EM or ATK goblet. not sure how it will go though but it's definitely something new

    Reply
  9. What are Diluc's starting stats? Post buffs? How much damage does he do before any buff? Is Diona C6? Also are we sure the widsith passive adds to the EM Sucrose transfers. For example, Sucrose transfering EM to Kazuha does nothing for his damage bonus passive. Besides, widsith is not BiS for a support EM transfer based Sucrose anyway, so I'm confused on why that's used here. It's too inconsistent even if it does transfer. This is a very unsatisfying comparison tbh.

    Reply
  10. Considerando que las constelaciones de Sacarosa están completas y las de Kazuha no, dudo mucho que hayas tomado eso en cuenta, para llamarlo así… "comparación".

    Reply
  11. Well, Im predicting that new characters in the future will be skill and auto attack dependent, rather than elemental reaction due to kazuha being released as a support that amplifies elemental dmg buff.

    Reply
  12. The comparison is very good and everything, but you also have to see that sucrose is completely supportive, there is the proof that sucrose is good but, also she had all the constellations and kazuha is not completely supportive and did not have the constellations ( Although having them is a bit difficult 😂), although there is a bit of difference between what each buffets. They are both very good and everyone can use whatever they want 👍.

    Reply
  13. Because they buff different things and Kazuha reapplies an element with the second part of his skill, you can actually use BOTH Kazuha's and Sucrose's buff with tales of dragons for nuke compositions! The order would be: Apply element of nuke -> Kazuha swirl -> Sucrose swirl (removes element) -> swap to nuke for thrilling tales atk buff -> switch character and apply the element needed for the reaction you're going for -> Nuke burst

    Reply
  14. I have both c6 sucrose(at lvl80) and c0 kazuha (lvl70) and from my PERSONAL experience it's Kazuha > Sucorse for most cases.
    Things like exploring, CC, dps (i switch my characters roles alot) Kazuha excels in those but for dmg buff in abyss and certain domains, sucrose takes the cake.

    Hope my info help some of u guys decide rather to pull or skip for him and to the kazuha wanters, don't listen to the comments; he is not "useless" and I'm sure many ppl don't play genshin just to do abyss and domains 24/7, pull for him he's so worth it especially if you explore alot like me!!

    Reply
  15. Imo, kazuha is the better character, but not by much. I feel like running thrilling tails on sucrose is good, but you could be losing out on a lot of damage, as well as energy recharge if you would have just used sac frags. I like kazuha cc better just because it's more consistent, and there damage potentials are very similar, but sucrose relys on thrilling tails and c1 to pump out more damage. On top of this, she had some er issues when I played her while my 15 er kazuha got his burst up very quickly. I also want to give props to mihoyo for not completely powe creeping sucrose, as she is still relevevent and good!

    Reply

Leave a Comment